Presenters
Source
🕵️♀️ Unmasking the Truth: Debugging Queries with Row Data Samples 🚀
Hey everyone! 👋 As a tech blogger, I love diving deep into the nitty-gritty of how systems work. Today, we’re tackling a surprisingly complex issue: the discrepancy between what you see in monitoring tools like Prometheus and Victoria Metrics and what’s actually happening in your database. Let’s explore how viewing row samples can be your secret weapon for troubleshooting.
🤯 The Illusion of Data: What You See Isn’t Always Real
Roman, a key figure at Victor Metrics, brilliantly explains that the data you observe in these monitoring platforms isn’t a direct reflection of your database’s stored data. It’s an interpretation. When you run a query, you’re hitting an instance or range API, which then interprets the row data stored within the database. This process introduces several potential pitfalls:
- Sampling Issues: Using larger sample intervals can lead to fewer samples than actually exist.
- Staleness: Monitoring systems like Prometheus and Victoria Metrics can display ephemeral data points, reflecting data from targets that have already died.
- Inaccurate Rate Calculations: The rate calculation, which compares data points within a “look-behind window,” can be skewed if those points are identical.
🔍 The Troubleshooting Process: Exporting Row Data
So, how do we cut through the noise and find the real story? Roman’s team realized that the most effective way to diagnose these issues was to export the raw row data. This allows you to examine every sample, pinpointing the root cause of discrepancies. It’s a crucial step in the troubleshooting workflow.
🛠️ The Feature Request: A Row Data View
This led to a feature request and subsequent implementation of a dedicated “row view” within the Victoria Metrics UI. This view provides a direct way to inspect the underlying data, bypassing the interpreted metrics.
📊 Comparing Rate vs. Row Data: A Concrete Example
Let’s look at a practical example. Roman demonstrates a scenario where the rate metric appears to be fluctuating wildly, but when viewed as raw row data, the issue becomes clear.
- Initial Observation: The rate metric shows erratic behavior, with spikes and zeros.
- Row Data Reveal: Zooming into the row data reveals data samples spaced 10 seconds apart, with individual samples occurring every second.
- The Solution: The user was running high availability pairs of collectors, sending data every 1 second to 1 millisecond. The rate calculation, comparing the last two data points in the look-behind window, resulted in zeros when those points were identical.
🚀 Enhancements & Future Directions
While the row view is a fantastic starting point, Roman outlines some key areas for improvement:
- Duplicate Detection: Currently, the view doesn’t highlight duplicate data samples. A visual indicator (like a prominent red icon) would immediately flag potential issues.
- Stale Marker Identification: Adding stale marker indicators would help identify data points that are no longer valid, further improving troubleshooting accuracy.
🌐 Conclusion: Empowering Users with Data Transparency
The row data view represents a significant step forward in empowering users to debug their queries effectively. By providing direct access to the raw data, it eliminates the guesswork and allows for a deeper understanding of system behavior. It’s a testament to the importance of transparency and data visibility in modern monitoring.
This feature is a valuable addition to the Victoria Metrics troubleshooting guide, offering a streamlined way to export and analyze row data. It’s a powerful tool for anyone working with complex monitoring systems. 🎯✨